'Evaluating a Website for Credibility Essay\r'

'A look for men’s wellness related web web site conducted utilise the man search locomotive engine Google.com. Men’s health Network (MHN), http://www.menshealthnetwork.org, is a non-profit-making organization reaching out to viriles and their families management on the growing health crisis that advert the previous(p) mortality of men (Men’s Health Network, 2014). approximately 50% of the population is male; evaluating the sites credibility is master(prenominal) when using it as an selective entropyal tool for male patients related to prevention and management of health.\r\nEvaluation of website\r\nMHN is comprised of spokespersons and consultatory board. The website discloses a limited list of spokespersons with title and aras of educational focus. The site states, â€Å"… at that place are over 800 physicians, cordial health experts, and another(prenominal) key thought leaders among the MHN Board of Advisors…” (Men’s H ealth Network, 2014). The call forability of the website is non technical, the average person will be competent to read the information on the site and be able to understand the intent of the organizations message. The information that is presented is veracious but referencing to studies and citations are lacking or difficult to set. Brief explanations of diseases are summarized followed by associate to away(p) sources much(prenominal) as the Ameri green goddess Urology Association, issue Institute of Health, or Journal of Men’s Health for additional information.\r\nMHN is sponsored by monetary donations from the public as well as internships to promote education to the public and policy makers related to men’s health (Men’s Health Network, 2014). Partnerships are publicly display at the bottom of the website and range from for-profit medicine companies such as Glaxo Smith Kline, Bayer and Pfizer as well as nonprofit organizations such as Boy Scouts o f America and Veterans Health Council. Since the number of for-profit partnerships with MHN supersedes the nonprofit partnerships, one can view the information give upd on MHN as favoring the for profit companies despite MHN having connexions to exterior sources for information on diseases.\r\nMHN website navigation is handlingr neighborly with headings at the top of the web foliates that are very(a) on every page. The font utilized is clear, well-to-do to read, and not strenuous on the eyes. All colligate in headings are operational and link phrases are clearly described to target page. MHN security link states commitment to ensuring user privacy and that any information collected is used only in unison to the November 2012 policy (Men’s Health Network, 2014). MHN informs that the website will gather up permission to place â€Å"cookies” on user’s computer.\r\nThe term â€Å"cookie” is defined and gives the user certain consent. MHN clearly states that clicking links to partnerships and outside sources link takes the user away from MHN site and states, â€Å"we cannot be responsible for the fortress and privacy of any information which you provide whilst tour such sites and such sites are not governed by this privacy statement.” (Men’s Health Network, 2014).\r\nEmpirical secernate\r\nBuilding credibility for a website requires providing links to respected organizations which increase traffic, thereby increasing its relevance in search outcomes (Calabro, 2010). MHN achieves this with a banner containing links to other organizations for the indorser to get additional information, but the sites that the reader is linked to do not always repay a link back. Calabro (2010) suggests that updating the home page regularly with updated graphics, information, and testimonials are vital to enhancing the websites movement on the internet. MHN, compared to www.nih.org which publicly displays the sites last revis ion, information contained on the site doesn’t display last revision although there is updating to the site by evidence of seminar announcements, online flyers, and iron releases. In a study of 1,442 acute pull off nurses employed in one large hospital system with readily available library sources, 43% reported starting a search with Google.\r\nOf that base 64% reported success in obtaining results using a general search engine such as Google. While 49% started a search using CINAHL or MEDLINE, a much little percentage reported successful searching (20% and 24% respectively) of these professional databases. (Miller, grave, Jones, & adenylic acid; Sievert, 2010, p. 3) Not having a subscription to CINAHL or MEDLINE, according to (Miller et al., 2010), should not hinder knowledgeable nurses in using public search engines for credible information as a tool to educate patients and families.\r\n screening to care for practice\r\nEvaluating information found on the internet i s important to properly educate patients as MHN provides educational material for men, boys, women and families. The professional nurse can utilize the site resources to aide families to cope with ailments that affect their male loved ones. Nurses can resource MHN to provide information to families to co-pay card programs to curb the high comprise of health insurance.\r\nSummary\r\nMHN demonstrates credibility by the use of expert advising board and links to creditable organizations which perplex done studies to support their mission. The site is easy to find on public search engines, easy to read for the lay person while giving links to more detailed information for the healthcare professional.\r\nReferences\r\nCalabro A 2010 Endhave your presensce on the internet with an improved website.Calabro, A. (2010). Enhance your presence on the internet with an improved website. O&P Business News, 19(12), 18. 201409201149291993026019 Mens Health NetworkMen’s Health Network. (n .d.). Retrieved September 15, 2014, from http://www.menshealthnetwork.org 201409161816071882827044 Miller L C Graves R S Jones B B Sievert M C 2010 Beyond Google: Finding and evaluating web-based information for community-based treat practice.Miller, L. C., Graves, R. S., Jones, B. B., & Sievert, M. C. (2010). Beyond Google: Finding and evaluating web-based information for community-based nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(1), 1-16. inside:10.2202/1548-923X.1961 201409201214161550333619\r\n'