Laertes and Fortinbras as Foils for Shakespeares Hamlet Essay

Laertes and Fortinbras as Foils for small town Hamlet, the major division in the Shakespeargon play of the same name, was faced with a decision upon learning that Claudius polish off his father. Should he believe the ghost, and avenge his fathers murder? Or is the ghost evil, laborious to coerce him into killing Claudius? Throughout the play, we actualise Hamlets struggle with this issue. Many opportunities plagiarize for him to kill Claudius, but he is unable to act because he cannot impel himself to believe the Ghost. Shakespeare uses Laertes and Fortinbras as foils to Hamlet, in order to help us reckon why Hamlet acts the way he does. Foils are used in plays so that the readers are better able to understand the major character (Hamlet). In a foil, the minor character is similar in umteen ways to the main character so that we will compare the two. However, it is with these similarities that we are able to see the more important differences between the two. The major f oil for Hamlet is Laertes, the son of Polonius. The most unadorned similarity is that they are both young men. They also come from relatively similar backgrounds, a Danish aristocratic upbringing. They also both have some college education. This leads us to another similarity Semicolons vs. colons they both have the ability to use ordered and rational reasoning. However, they do differ on their applications of formal reasoning. We see this logical and rational reasoning in Hamlet, in Acts 1& 2 when he sets up the mouse trap for Claudius, in order to determine if he is guilty of murdering his father. Hamlets ability to think many moves ahead and predict what the kings reception will be if he is guilty, shows a type of reasoning beyond a norma... ...f the papers in this set, you will see that the similarities between Fortinbras and Hamlet are not so obvious-- few writers picked up on them, and no(prenominal) did as good a job at specifying them as did this writer. here(predica te) again, this writer backs up the statement with numerous specific examples. Some worn down writers who are also weak thinkers will use words such as obvious when they have no evidence and may in fact be wrong. In such cases, the use of the word obvious is an attempt to cow the reader by implying that if the reader does not see what is supposed to be obvious then the reader is stupid. Be sure in using such words, and beware when you find them in your reading. (Another preferred is the phrase of course.) Works CitedShakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet. ca. 1600-1601. Ed. Edward Hubler. A Signet Classic. New York Penguin Publishers,1963.