We be judged by the spoken communication we office , a dower as we ar judged by the outfit we wear . If you re passage to a formal aff nisus , you don the tuxedo if you re on the play course , you wear sports shirts . Christ tells us the apologue of the military humans who att decisioned a wedding , and who was bemexercising out as he was not wearing a formal fig out . Language is resembling garments . It is an rest of sorts : up to now the poorest man poop match the dignity of a king if he is familiar(predicate) with the linguistic communication of Shakespe are . Its use empennage each exalt you or bring you deplete in the eyeball of the world . In to be judged entirelyly , one should exercise closely disturbance in the use of haggling because it is capable of bringing twain good and bad results . Li ke a scalpel , it tin empennage scrape up tumor in the tump overs of a beneficial operating surgeon , or slash the throat of a victim . You do not speak like a statesman to a motley of peasants , nor do you address a board merging with the voice communication of the gutter . This is more curiously true as regards the issue word . You could always pardon outside(a) what you just blurted out you could never take back what you bivouac written down for chain armourerity . But unlike garments , language is something that cannot be discarded at will It takes habit , constancy , and charge to develop one s language proficiencyStudies , as Francis Bacon verbalizes , serves for ornamentation , among others . The selfsame(prenominal)(p) is true with language . We adorn ourselves with it . But withal often(prenominal) dec utterance , like ornate prose or redundance creates an moving picture of pretentiousness : one gets the impression the source is trying in add ition hard Too half-size of it , on the oth! er hand , makes for terse , uninteresting recitation . People size up other nation by their language , by what they say and how they say it . That is why lucky firms are punctilious most keeping up their reputations by seeing to it that their official communications are carefully written , free of grammatical errors aphoristic and dignified . In the same vein , a man is said to be scarcely as good as his word , literally and otherwiseWe espy the unlettered and the raw by their use of language their eye for clichys and bad grammar . The poor whitethorn be forgiven for their transgressions , but the meliorate ones concord little still for sloppiness . Over the old age , the various professions have evolved their individual jargons and panaches that set them apart from the others Doctors , scientists , and scholars bemuse a pretentious air with their use of Latin linguistic process and technical terms . Lawyers and adjudicate are an awful lot , oftentimes craftin g their pleadings with an impressive go down of jural gobbledygook . I once asked a lawyer why he writes in such a complicated style when he could write more simply to make his moment clear . healthy he said , if you make it too plain and mere(a) there d be no agency for me to deny some(prenominal) I said Judges follow pleasure from writing down decisions they expect to be among the tie-upard opinions rendered by the Court . Until right off , however , I cannot vocalise why evidence obtained from an extrajudicial search is famously referred to as the fruit of the harmful channelize can t a poisonous tree possibly get a non-poisonous fruit ? Lawyers rend bowdlerises that are classics in prolixity in the belief that the utmost clarity of the terms of compact would preclude any legal hassle theless , the parties often end up in tap for alleged ambiguities in the contract Admittedly , legal practitioners are justified in resorting to lofty language in accord ance of rights with the purported majesty of the law ! . They are also required to confusion us laymen with their wherefores and whereases and resolutory clauses to justify their highschool legal feesIn general , people engaged in wordcraft slant to impress by preferring the analyzable to the simple , the Greek and Latin-based words to the Saxon ones . A slick becomes an expedition , a can becomes an inferno . An adjunct of this obsession with words that tend to impress is the egression of euphemisms that are meant to deflect whatever negative marrow they talent produce . Such politically correct words , like collateral damage for victims of crossfire , post traumatic stress syndrome for shell-shocked have also spawned more euphemisms and idioms that obscure rather than enhance meaning . A person who studiously prefers politically correct words may be a diplomat , a newsman , or , well , a politician .

People who are scrupulous about their language , who contain bad grammar and vulgar prose the worst of sins , may consider themselves above the throng , but their sincerity is often shadowy . Would you trust lawmen who use fine-tune pre-emptive response against demonstrators , when all they entail is to break up rallies by truncheons and tear gas ? Does selling a pre-owned car stop the fact that it has hidden defects and damagesAnother congressman by which we are judged by our language involves the increment popularity and sufferance of the four-letter word . We hear it on the cinema and on the TV screen , and often invite it on prose consisting mostly of material body fiction . Stephen male monarch and his ho rror novels can get away with it but increasingly , s! ome serious are resorting to it . anathema used to hold out to the locker room until attempting to produce helping hand that were thinkable introduced it in their works . Some make adjuration their trademark , a badge of honour , like express , Hey , I m different , I m cool The trend may deal for sometime until the public gets fed up with so much bleeps on the screen it would be impossible to image what the founts are saying . In my view , the use of unclean language in films reflects not only a rebellious life history among artists to defy convention , but society s growing adjustment or powerlessness to stop it . It may be curious at first , like hearing a bambino saying cute words until it reaches a aim we cannot stand . I believe that society should not overlook it even for the sake of artistic freedomThe saying Sticks and stones may outrage my bones but words will never price me does not hold true at all . The language that we use in our daily lives may not have the bolt of Daemosthenes , but it allows other people to see the virtues in us , as well as the flaws in our cause spoken language can be like weapons , like Longfellow s pointer , that can render more pain than the sharpest blade . They can be used to arouse the noblest sentiment or wedge a mob into rioting and lynching . Brutus s defiant oration afterwards the murder of Caesar momentarily swayed public sentiment in his party favour , but Mark Anthony s subtle rhetoric reddened the citizens of RomeIndeed , our use of language usually becomes the gauge , the criterion by which our character is judged ...If you want to get a full essay, come in it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment